{"id":3660,"date":"2014-11-17T13:14:10","date_gmt":"2014-11-17T18:14:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mobile-solutions.ingenico.com\/?p=3660"},"modified":"2014-11-18T10:26:50","modified_gmt":"2014-11-18T15:26:50","slug":"7-way-emv-is-invading-mobile-payments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mobile-solutions.ingenico.com\/7-way-emv-is-invading-mobile-payments\/","title":{"rendered":"Slideshow: 7 Ways EMV is Invading Mobile Payments"},"content":{"rendered":"
http:\/\/ow.ly\/EpLb1<\/a><\/p>\n Mobile tech providers are racing to incorporate EMV chip-and-PIN or chip-and-signature security into their offerings. But many of these companies are taking fundamentally different approaches to linking EMV and mobile technology.<\/p>\n Why Not Both?<\/strong><\/p>\n Ingenico’s Roam isn’t choosing a signature-only approach like Square’s upcoming readers or a PIN-only approach like PayPal’s non-U.S. product. Roam<\/a> offers both options in the U.S., but not at the same cost. Price-sensitive merchants may prefer its chip-and-signature device, while merchants that require more security will want PIN.<\/p>\n